'Have to respect CM': Madras HC backs Vijay, denies anticipatory bail to DMK MLA over ‘defamatory’ remarks

Madras High Court rejects anticipatory bail plea in case linked to remarks against Vijay

The Madras High Court has denied anticipatory bail to a DMK MLA booked over allegedly defamatory remarks targeting actor-turned-politician Vijay, observing that public discourse must maintain a certain level of dignity and that constitutional functionaries, including the Chief Minister, deserve respect.

The case stems from comments allegedly made by the ruling party legislator during a political exchange involving Vijay, whose political outfit has increasingly emerged as a force in Tamil Nadu's political landscape. Following the remarks, a complaint was lodged alleging defamation and other offences, prompting the MLA to seek anticipatory bail.

While hearing the plea, the High Court declined to grant pre-arrest protection. The bench observed that political rivalry cannot justify personal attacks or offensive statements and stressed that individuals occupying constitutional offices must be treated with respect irrespective of political differences.

The court also referred to the responsibilities of political leaders and public representatives, noting that political debate should focus on issues and policies rather than personal insults. It remarked that freedom of speech does not grant unrestricted licence to make defamatory or derogatory statements.

Vijay, who formally entered politics with his party and has been actively expanding its presence across Tamil Nadu, has frequently found himself at the centre of sharp exchanges with leaders from rival political parties ahead of the state's upcoming electoral contests.

The prosecution argued that the nature of the alleged remarks warranted custodial investigation, while the defence sought protection from arrest, contending that the statements were made in a political context and should be viewed as part of democratic discourse.

After considering the submissions, the High Court declined to extend anticipatory bail, leaving the investigating agency free to proceed in accordance with law. The court clarified that its observations were confined to the bail proceedings and would not influence the merits of the criminal case during trial.

The order comes amid intensifying political rhetoric in Tamil Nadu, where exchanges between the ruling DMK and Vijay's party have become increasingly frequent. Legal experts note that the ruling reinforces the judiciary's view that political speech, while protected, is still subject to legal limits when allegations of defamation or other offences arise.

The investigation into the case is expected to continue, with further legal proceedings likely in the coming weeks.