Supreme Court cancels Sonam Raghuvanshi's bail, gives her 3 weeks to surrender
The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to Sonam Raghuvanshi, directing her to surrender before the concerned authorities within three weeks. The order came after the apex court found grounds to interfere with the relief granted by the lower court.
Written by
Jyoti Mukherjee
Supreme Court cancels Sonam Raghuvanshi's bail, gives her 3 weeks to surrender
The Supreme Court has cancelled the bail granted to Sonam Raghuvanshi, directing her to surrender before the appropriate authorities within three weeks.
The apex court passed the order while hearing a challenge to the bail granted by a lower court, concluding that the circumstances warranted interference with the earlier decision.
Supreme Court revokes bail
A Bench of the Supreme Court set aside the bail order, observing that the matter required reconsideration in light of the facts and legal submissions presented before it.
While cancelling the relief, the court granted Sonam Raghuvanshi three weeks' time to surrender, allowing her a limited period before being taken into custody.
The court's order effectively restores her custodial status once the surrender deadline expires.
Why did the court intervene?
The appeal before the Supreme Court challenged the legality of the bail order passed by the lower court.
After examining the records and hearing arguments from both sides, the Bench found sufficient grounds to revoke the bail.
The court, however, did not make any observations on the merits of the underlying criminal case, clarifying that the trial will proceed independently.
What happens next?
Following the Supreme Court's order, Sonam Raghuvanshi has been directed to surrender within the stipulated three-week period.
Once she surrenders, the trial proceedings in the case will continue before the competent court in accordance with the law.
Legal experts note that while the bail has been cancelled, Sonam Raghuvanshi retains the right to pursue any other legal remedies available under the judicial process.
Case remains under judicial scrutiny
The case continues to remain under judicial consideration, with further proceedings expected before the trial court.
The Supreme Court's decision underscores that bail orders can be reviewed and set aside if higher courts find legal or procedural deficiencies in the earlier grant of relief.
Keep reading
More in Politics
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Politics
Rajya Sabha to Take Up Taxation Laws and Bankers' Books Bills on Monday
The Rajya Sabha is scheduled to take up the Taxation Laws Bill and the Bankers' Books Bill on Monday as part of its legislative agenda for t…
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Politics
Telangana SIR: Owaisi Alleges BLOs Refusing Enumeration Forms, Seeks Election Commission's Intervention
AIMIM president Asaduddin Owaisi has alleged that Booth Level Officers (BLOs) in Telangana are refusing to accept enumeration forms during t…
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Politics
AI Safety Must Keep Pace With Adoption in Financial Sector, Says CEA Anantha Nageswaran
Chief Economic Adviser (CEA) V. Anantha Nageswaran has stressed that artificial intelligence (AI) safety measures must evolve alongside the…
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Politics
'Stop Buying Petrol, Diesel Vehicles Until Govt Clarifies Stand on E20 Fuel': Arvind Kejriwal
AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal has urged people to refrain from buying petrol and diesel vehicles until the Centre clarifies its poli…
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Politics
ADR Report: 84% of Karnataka Ministers Face Criminal Cases; CM D.K. Shivakumar Richest in Cabinet
An analysis by the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) has found that 84% of ministers in the Karnataka Cabinet have declared criminal…
.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Politics
MEA Says Government ‘Doesn’t Endorse Anything’ Said by Ousted Bangladesh PM Sheikh Hasina During Media Interaction
The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has clarified that the Government of India does not endorse any statements made by ousted Bangladesh…
