Parties Reject Supreme Court's Mediation Proposal in Gyanvapi, Krishna Janmabhoomi and Sambhal Mosque Cases

Mediation Proposal Declined

Parties in the Gyanvapi, Krishna Janmabhoomi, and Sambhal mosque disputes have informed the Supreme Court that they do not wish to pursue mediation.

The court had suggested mediation as a possible means of exploring an amicable settlement before continuing with detailed hearings.

Preference for Judicial Adjudication

The concerned parties indicated that they would prefer the disputes to be decided through the judicial process rather than negotiated settlement.

As a result, the cases are expected to proceed through regular court hearings.

Cases Involved

The mediation proposal related to disputes concerning:

• The Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi.

• The Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi–Shahi Idgah dispute in Mathura.

• The Shahi Jama Masjid dispute in Sambhal.

These matters involve competing legal claims and are currently pending before the courts.

Supreme Court's Role

The Supreme Court occasionally encourages mediation in civil disputes where a negotiated settlement may be possible.

However, mediation is voluntary, and it proceeds only if all parties consent. Since the parties declined, the court is expected to continue hearing the cases on their legal merits.

Legal Position

The disputes remain sub judice, and no final judicial determination has been made.

The courts will continue to examine the evidence, legal submissions, and applicable laws before issuing any final judgments.

Looking Ahead

With mediation ruled out, the Supreme Court and other concerned courts will continue adjudicating the cases through the normal legal process.

The eventual outcomes will depend on the evidence presented and the courts' interpretation of the law.